Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/Merge_Sorted_Array_Python.md:
- Around line 33-35: The documentation incorrectly states that the temporary
list created by the slice assignment nums1[:j+1] = nums2[:j+1] is O(1) space;
update the text and footnote to reflect that nums2[:j+1] allocates up to O(n)
extra space in the worst case, or instead change the suggested optimization to
use an in-place residual copy via a while loop to achieve true O(1) auxiliary
space; specifically edit the paragraph referencing nums1[:j+1] = nums2[:j+1] and
the footnote at the line mentioning "O(1)  ※スライス代入の一時オブジェクト除く" to either (a)
state the correct O(n) temporary-space cost for the slice-based approach or (b)
replace the slice recommendation with a description of copying remaining
elements using a while loop to preserve O(1) extra space.

In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/Merge_Sorted_Array_Rust.md:
- Around line 9-15: Update the documentation paragraph that claims use of
saturating_sub/checked_sub and "compile-time" underflow prevention: replace
those statements with an accurate description that the implementation prevents
underflow via runtime guard conditions (the `while i > 0 && j > 0` and `while j
> 0` loops) and structural ordering, and clarify that casts from i32 to usize
use `as usize` and are safe given LeetCode bounds; align the revised wording
with the existing accurate explanation around lines 88–90 so the doc no longer
asserts use of `saturating_sub`/`checked_sub` or compile-time guarantees.

In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/Merge_Sorted_Array_TypeScript.md:
- Around line 96-99: 説明文が不正確なので修正してください：現在の「i >= 0 / j >= 0 のガードで nums1[i] は
number として安全」との記述は、noUncheckedIndexedAccess を有効にした環境では誤りです。対応策として、説明を「ガードだけでは
number|undefined のままになる」と明記するか、サンプルの添字アクセス（nums1[i], nums2[j]）を非 null
アサーション（nums1[i]!, nums2[j]!）または存在チェック（if (i in nums1) / if (j in
nums2)）に変更して型を明示的に狭める旨を反映してください。該当箇所は文章中の「i >= 0 / j >= 0 のガード」記述とサンプルコード内の
nums1[i] / nums2[j] を更新してください。

In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/README_React.html:
- Line 1066: The JSX conditional currently hardcodes the upper bound as "j < 3"
instead of using the N2 variable; update the condition "{j >= 0 && j < 3 &&
(...)}" to use the N2 identifier (e.g., "{j >= 0 && j < N2 && (...)}") so the j
pointer's boundary check consistently relies on N2; locate the JSX block
containing the conditional with "j" and replace the numeric literal 3 with the
N2 symbol.
- Around line 976-999: Replace the hardcoded bounds (6 and 3) used in the
pointer visibility checks with the precomputed variables N1 and N2: update the
conditional checks that render the i and k pointer groups (conditions like "i >=
0 && i < 6" and "k >= 0 && k < 6" and any similar checks using 3) to use "i >= 0
&& i < N1" or "k >= 0 && k < N2" as appropriate; ensure you reference the
existing N1/N2 computed earlier and keep the phase !== 'done' check intact so
pointer drawing logic (the <g>, <line>, <text> blocks around i and k) behaves
correctly with varying data sizes.

In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/README.md:
- Around line 5-15: The README's top-level headings don't match the required
5-section template; restructure the document so the five top-level sections are
"Overview", "Algorithm" (move "アルゴリズム要点 TL;DR", "図解", and "正しさのスケッチ" under this
section), "Complexity" (keep "計算量" here), "Implementation" (move "Python 実装" and
"エッジケースと検証観点" under this), and "Optimization" (move "CPython 最適化ポイント" here); put
non-essential items like "FAQ" as a subsection under the most appropriate
section (e.g., Implementation or Overview) and ensure headings use the exact
canonical English section titles so the repo-wide README template is preserved.
- Around line 44-46: README の空間計算量説明が不正確です；nums2[:j+1] のスライスは最大で n
要素の新しいリストを生成するため「定数サイズの一時オブジェクト」という表現を削除し、該当箇所（44–46 行、156–157 行、305–309
行）で空間計算量を O(n) に修正するか、もし O(1) を主張したいならスライス版を廃してループで末尾コピーする実装へ差し替えて README
をループ版の説明に更新してください（参照識別子: nums2[:j+1] を明確に記述して修正箇所を特定してください）。

In `@public/Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88.
Merge Sorted Array/README_React.html:
- Around line 1230-1233: The JSX currently uses dangerouslySetInnerHTML with
cur.desc which violates the template rule against innerHTML; replace the
dangerouslySetInnerHTML usage in the <p className="text-slate-600 leading-7
text-sm"> element and render cur.desc as plain text (e.g. {cur.desc}) so React
sets textContent instead of innerHTML, and ensure any entity sequences like
"&ge;" are converted to their literal characters (≥) or escaped upstream before
rendering to avoid XSS.

---

Outside diff comments:
In `@public/index.html`:
- Around line 419-436: The changes in public/index.html (e.g., the search
container and tab buttons including elements with ids/classes like searchInput,
searchCount, searchClear and tab-count) were made by hand but this file is
auto-generated; revert any manual edits to public/index.html and instead update
the source data used by python generate_index.py (the canonical dataset that
drives counts, cards, and dates), then run python generate_index.py to
regenerate public/index.html so the generated output stays in sync and manual
edits are not overwritten.

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/Merge_Sorted_Array_Python.md:
- Around line 20-27: The table entry for "コピー後 `list.sort()`" incorrectly lists
space complexity as O(1); update that cell to O(m+n) to reflect that making a
copy of the arrays allocates additional memory. Locate the row labeled "コピー後
`list.sort()`" in the comparison table and change its 空間計算量 value from O(1) to
O(m+n) so the table matches the described approach.

In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/Merge_Sorted_Array_Rust.md:
- Around line 96-98: The sentence asserting "コンパイラは確実にインライン展開・SIMD 最適化を適用できます"
is too strong; change it to a conditional phrasing or remove SIMD mention.
Locate that exact phrase in the Merge_Sorted_Array_Rust.md text and replace it
with a weaker statement such as "コンパイラは最適化レベルや実装に依存してインライン展開やSIMD
最適化を適用する可能性があります" or drop "SIMD 最適化" entirely so the claim no longer asserts
guaranteed SIMD vectorization.

In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/README_React.html:
- Around line 249-255: The README claims O(1) auxiliary space but uses slice
assignment nums1[: j + 1] = nums2[: j + 1], which can allocate O(n) temporaries;
either replace that slice-assignment with an in-place while-copy loop that
iterates from the end (copy elements one-by-one from nums2 into nums1 using
indices j and i to maintain O(1) space) and remove the memmove/CPython-specific
note, or keep the slice version and update the complexity table and text to
state O(n) auxiliary space consistently; modify the code paths referencing nums1
and nums2 (the slice assignment and surrounding merge logic) and the complexity
table entries to match the chosen approach.

In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/README.md:
- Around line 152-157: 表内の「`nums1 + nums2` 後 `.sort()`」戦略の空間計算量が誤って O(1)
になっているので、`nums1 + nums2` によって長さ m+n の新しいリストが確保される点を考慮して空間計算量を O(m+n)
に修正してください（該当は README.md の "| `nums1 + nums2` 後 `.sort()` | ... | O(1) |" の行）。

---

Duplicate comments:
In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/Merge_Sorted_Array_Python.md:
- Around line 49-64: The docstring and comments conflict about auxiliary space:
update the complexity notes to match the actual implementation (slice assignment
uses O(n) extra space). Specifically, where the docstring/lines claim O(1) for
the slice-based variant, change them to O(n) (or revert the implementation to
the in-place while version); ensure every mention (including the description
near the slice assignment nums1[: j + 1] = nums2[: j + 1] and the function
docstring for the merge routine) consistently reports Space Complexity: O(n)
unless you replace the slice-based code with the true O(1) three-pointer
in-place algorithm.

In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/Merge_Sorted_Array_TypeScript.md:
- Around line 78-83: The residual-copy loop uses nums2[j] which yields type
number | undefined under noUncheckedIndexedAccess; update the loop in the
Merge_Sorted_Array implementation to use a non-undefined access (e.g., nums1[k]
= nums2[j]! ) or add an existence check before assignment so nums2[j] is
narrowed to number; reference the loop variables nums1, nums2, j, k and the
while (j >= 0) block when making the change.

In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/README.md:
- Around line 5-13: The README currently adds a sixth top-level heading via "##
目次（Table of Contents）", violating the required 5-section structure; remove or
demote this heading by either deleting the "## 目次（Table of Contents）" line or
converting it to a subsection under Overview (e.g., change to "### 目次（Table of
Contents）" or move its content beneath the "## Overview" section) so the file
only exposes the five top-level headings: Overview, Algorithm, Complexity,
Implementation, Optimization.
- Around line 270-280: The README's FAQ incorrectly claims "本実装（O(1)）" which
contradicts the current Python implementation that uses slice-assignment
(nums1[:j+1] = nums2[:j+1]) and earlier text stating O(n); update the paragraph
that compares heapq.merge (and the shown snippet using nums1[m:] / merged) to
instead state that the current implementation is O(n) in extra space (or match
the same O(n) description used elsewhere), and ensure the wording references the
actual slice-assignment algorithm (nums1[:j+1] = nums2[:j+1]) for consistency.

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/Merge_Sorted_Array_Rust.md:
- Line 24: Update the space complexity for the table row labeled "前からコピー後ソート"
from O(1) to O(m+n) to reflect the copy step; edit the Markdown table line
containing "前からコピー後ソート" so the second complexity column remains
"O((m+n)log(m+n))" and the space complexity cell becomes "O(m+n)" to match other
language docs.

In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/Merge_Sorted_Array_TypeScript.md:
- Line 24: Update the space-complexity value for the table row labeled "コピー後
`.sort()`" from O(1) to O(m+n) so it matches the rest of the table and the
explanatory text; locate the Markdown table entry containing "コピー後 `.sort()`"
and replace the `O(1)` cell with `O(m+n)`.

In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/README_React.html:
- Around line 751-757: Update the space-complexity cell in the comparison table
row labeled "コピー後 .sort()" so it reflects the correct complexity for the
copy-then-sort approach: change the displayed value from O(1) to O(m+n); locate
the table row containing the text "コピー後 .sort()" in README_React.html and update
that third column cell to "O(m+n)" to match the copy cost.
- Around line 1333-1346: In the TypeScript code tab for the Merge Sorted Array
implementation, add non-null assertion operators to indexed accesses to satisfy
noUncheckedIndexedAccess: change the comparison to use nums1[i]! and nums2[j]!
(i.e. if (nums1[i]! >= nums2[j]!)), change the assignment when taking from nums1
to nums1[k] = nums1[i]!, change the assignment when taking from nums2 to
nums1[k] = nums2[j]!, and update the leftover-copy loop to nums1[k--] =
nums2[j--]! so all indexed reads use the non-null assertion.

In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/README.md:
- Line 327: The README.md currently triggers markdownlint MD047; fix it by
adding exactly one newline character at the end of the file (ensure the file
ends with a single trailing newline) so the final line has a terminating newline
and the MD047 warning is cleared.

---

Duplicate comments:
In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/Merge_Sorted_Array_Python.md:
- Line 5: Update the description that currently claims the three-pointer
tail-fill method fills nums1 "with no additional allocations" (mentions at the
sentence referencing nums1 and the three-pointer approach and again at the later
description) to match the O(n) wording used elsewhere: remove the absolute "no
extra allocation" claim and instead state that the algorithm runs in O(m+n) time
and O(1) extra space if implemented in-place by writing into nums1 from the end,
or note that using slice assignment creates a temporary list (thus O(m+n) extra
allocation) — adjust both the sentence referencing nums1/the three-pointer
method and the later line to use the same phrasing so the file is consistent.

In `@Algorithm/Sort/MergeSort/leetcode/claude` 4.6 sonnet extended/88. Merge
Sorted Array/README_React.html:
- Around line 625-656: The SVG flowchart still shows the old O(n)
auxiliary-space copy "nums1[:j+1] = nums2[:j+1]"; update the text node that
currently contains that exact string to the in-place O(1) description used by
the algorithm (for example replace it with "while j >= 0: nums1[k] = nums2[j];
k--; j--" or an equivalent succinct in-place notation like "コピー: while j>=0 →
nums1[k]=nums2[j]") so the diagram matches the O(1) implementation; locate the
text element by its current content "nums1[:j+1] = nums2[:j+1]" in the SVG block
under the "nums2 残余コピー" rect and replace its text content accordingly.